| Burning
Man - The Evolution of Radical Self-Expression
December, 2005
The Annual event known as Burning Man began over two decades ago with
one man’s inauspicious ritualistic bonfire of a twelve foot wooden
figure on a beach in San Francisco, and has subsequently become known
worldwide as a radical experiment in art and culture which attracts thousands
of devoted participants to one of the least hospitable locations on the
planet - the utterly dead alkali flats of the Black Rock desert in Nevada.
From the viewpoint of an outside observer, the expense, sacrifice and
challenges faced by those who trek to this barren landscape must seem
like destructive folly. Yet each year the event known as Burning Man grows,
manifest in a self-organizing city in the desert that ranks as one of
the largest in the state - a city that includes miles of roads, a US post
office, several newspapers, health and safety utilities, more than a dozen
radio stations, and more art, installations and performance per person
than any other place on earth. Ask a hundred participants what Burning
Man means and you’re likely to get a hundred different answers.
To some people its an art festival; to others it’s a rave or an
experiment in autonomous community. For many, it embodies a significance
bordering on religion, while others see it only as a week-long free pass
for hedonistic extravagance - a chance to be and act in ways forbidden
by society.
How did this phenomenon grow, and why has it become a worldwide incubator
for “radical self-expression” and interactive art? To understand
the layered and multifaceted meaning of the event, one must look to Larry
Harvey, the individual whose beach bonfire marks the beginning of the
event, and who remains in many ways the face of Burning Man. Equal parts
prophet, guide, and snake-oil salesman, Larry has been called a saint,
a sinner, and most importantly - the most dangerous man in America.
BEGINNINGS
During the summer solstice of 1986, Larry and a few friends built a wooden
figure of a man, little more than a scarecrow really. They erected it
on Baker Beach in San Francisco, and set it on fire. It was, as Larry
called it, “ a spontaneous act of radical self-expression”.
Many myths and rumors surround that first burn. Whose idea it was? Who
was there? Was there a meaning in the fire? While consensus on all the
details is unlikely, all seem to agree that out of this simple creative
act grew a unique cultural phenomenon. The single most critical facet
of the whole event, says Larry, “was that it was conducted in a
public space, impetuously as a pure gesture”1 It wasn’t yet
called by any specific name, but the gesture resonated with all involved.
The first man had burned, and it was good.
Larry and a small crew fully committed to the ritual, and continued for
several more years on Baker Beach. By 1998, the wooden man grew to nearly
40 feet tall. That year the ritual was interrupted by the police, who
reluctantly agreed after some negotiation to allow the man to be burned,
but only if he is lowered, sawed in to pieces and piled together for safety
reasons. This undignified end inspired members of the San Francisco Cacophony
Society to suggest moving the burn to a little used desert outside of
Reno where they have been throwing outrageous events for years.
The Cacophony Society is “a randomly gathered network of free spirits
united in the pursuit of experiences beyond the pale of mainstream society.”2
Emerging from under the same American shadows as Burning Man, the Cacophony
Society began in the mid-eighties as a nebulous group of artists and edge-seekers
committed to pushing the boundaries of public performance and art. Over
the years, they have staged mock protests, turned a public railcar into
a cabaret, produced citywide surrealist treasure hunts, as well as many
more absurd and anarchistic happenings. They had been using the Black
Rock Desert because it allowed for events and activities that were beyond
even the boundaries of liberal San Francisco. It was at an established
Cacophony tradition on the playa, the annual Zone Trip in 1990, that the
man was first transported, erected and burned in that location. It is
also around this time that the ritual takes on the moniker Burning Man
- a name so basic, primal and direct, both neutral of and loaded with
meaning that it’s impossible to imagine it called by any other.
THE
TAZ
As the event took root in the dead soil of the Black Rock Playa, it grew
each year in size, scope and meaning. Yet the event, and the community
that grew with it were still mostly wild, unstructured, and utterly free
of influences, control and repression from the outside world. As Hakim
Bey would refer to it, a TAZ was emerging. A TAZ, or Temporary Autonomous
Zone, is the expression of cultural rebels pushing against the world of
modern institutions and the control they exert. As implied by the name,
these areas beyond society boarders are not intended to last - they are
constructions of convenience, in which like-minded outsiders could live
by their own rules.
| The Sea-Rovers and Corsairs
of the 18th century created an "information network" that
spanned the globe: primitive and devoted primarily to grim business,
the net nevertheless functioned admirably. Scattered throughout the
net were islands, remote hideouts where ships could be watered and
provisioned, booty traded for luxuries and necessities. Some of these
islands supported "intentional communities," whole mini-
societies living consciously outside the law and determined to keep
it up, even if only for a short but merry life.3 |
As with many facets of Burning Man, whether it has ever truly existed
as a TAZ is subject to constant debate, although most agree that it’s
current incarnation is a psudo-TAZ at best. A place where autonomy, anarchy
and abandon are revered and celebrated within limits- and within sight
of police, fire and federal agents. Even if many participants never reach
them, law, order and regimented social structures nonetheless define the
boundaries of the event. Truly astounding freedom of expression is still
the core of the event and all that it represents, but to some, the compromise
with the authorities over the 1990 Baker Beach burn marked the beginning
of the end of any real TAZ, but the sense of freedom and liberation unlike
any other on earth is still a significant motivating factor for those
who attend.
Throughout the early 90’s, the event began to gain notoriety outside
the small circle of friends who organized it and it’s annual population
grew at a steady pace. It was still viewed primarily as a social event
- the large scale artworks and installations had just begun to take root
- although each year there was an increasing number of costumes, performances,
and themed activities. The idea that everyone attending participate in
some way was always an unspoken assumption, stemming from its early days
as the Zone Party, but interaction and participation truly began solidifying
as a social responsibility in response to the number of curiosity seekers
and voyeurs that continued to arrive. In addition to the ethos of radical
self expression was added the rally cry of “No Spectators”,
the expectation that everyone is engaged in the event on some level, that
nobody is there simply taking without in some way contributing. While
installing art or performing are the most visible ways of contributing
to the community, there are many other ways in which people can participate
- Burning Man is a huge city, and it runs on volunteers.
Considering the near-total ban on economic transactions at the event,
the idea of a gift economy is the foundation upon which the community
now organizes itself, and is critical for it’s ability each year
to rise seemingly out of nowhere, exist in glory for a week, and then
quickly and efficiently vanish, leaving virtually no trace it was ever
there. Without the mostly volunteer efforts of thousands of people, Burning
Man could not exist, and certainly couldn’t continue to resist the
forces of capitalist economies. Drawing upon traditional precedents of
tribal cultures, the gift economy allows all involved with Burning Man
to avoid the influences which so often stifle creative expression. Having
origins in Potlatch rituals of Pacific Northwest Native Americans, a gift
economy...
| “
is an economic system in which the prevalent mode of exchange is for
goods and services to be given without explicit agreement upon a quid
pro quo. Typically, this occurs in a cultural context where there
is an expectation either of reciprocation - in the form of goods or
services of comparable value, or of political support, general loyalty,
honor to the giver, etc. - or of the gift being passed on in some
other manner”.4 |
In contrast to commodity-based economies, Burning Man has always aimed
to avoid the inevitable commercialization of it’s culture by encouraging
the gifting of one’s art and labor, without expectation of fame,
payment, or rewards associated with the outside world. It is the freedom
from these expectations that allows for the unfettered expressions of
creativity and sharing. Burning Man artists...
| “
believe in the idea of gifting their art to the community and having
it exist for a week for everyone’s pleasure and enjoyment, and
not for the fact of putting it on their resume or selling it through
a gallery. And there are artists (in BM) who do just that, they make
art for a living year-round - and that's just fine, But the idea that
art can be made for reasons other than for sale is a radical idea
in our culture - because the art world is like all the other marketing
worlds - its just products, sales and marketing. So we’ve taken
it out of that context and focus on the self expression. And artists
who are in that art market can take this one opportunity a year to
make whatever the hell they want and put it out there without having
to be consistent with their body of work, without having t to sell.5
|
The watershed moment when Burning Man really began to crystalize as a
art-oriented movement was 1996, the year Burning Man had its first defined
theme: The Inferno. In response to growing pressure and tensions among
the organizers and community over the future direction of the event, it
was decided to revel in the dichotomy emerging among those who saw the
event as a hippy be-in and those who wanted, as one Burner puts it, “to
fuck, shoot cars, and burn stuff.”
Additionally, media attention had finally started to focus on Burning
Man and it’s reputation for sex, drugs and general subversiveness,
and many in the community were concerned that with media attention would
come the inevitable corporate pressures to capitalize on the event . The
idea behind the Inferno theme was that the devil and his corporate arm,
Helco were at Burning Man and were planning to purchase the event. Organizers
produced a “pageant” in which Larry Harvey is tempted to sell
Burning Man to the devil. In the end, the devil is denied, and the Helco
corporate tower, an installation which stood on the Playa all week, was
burned to the ground in a riotous performance that is now described in
terms that transcend memory into the realm of mythology. One Burning Man
artist remembers that 1996
| “was
clearly not a sustainable event. That was an apocalyptical event.
Things were going wrong. It felt like we were at war. But there was
this curious sense there that something very important was going on
- that it was imperative that we, together, create this thing. Something
was at stake. A lot of people had come to that collective decision
and were self-organizing around an unstable common goal. The public
was beginning to take notice. The forces of chaos had also noticed,
and those forces collided in a very compelling and scary way”6
|
The 1996 event was significant for other reasons as well. The dangerous
quality was tangible, not just perceived, and the Burning Man community
experienced it’s first death on the Playa in addition to several
other accidents that caused serious injury. Not surprisingly, there was
a significantly increased law enforcement presence that year from two
local counties, the state, and the Bureau of Land Management. They immediately
required that the event organizers change their management approach for
the event if they wanted to continue using the location, and began imposing
fees, restrictions and requirements in an attempt to badger the event
into going elsewhere. As a result, the Burning Man organization, ( the
BMorg, or Borg as it was called in a sardonic nod to the cyborg race from
the Star Trek television series ), was officially structured into a limited
liability corporation, and the event itself began to mature. A city plan
was instituted, with well-defined streets, camping zones and art areas,
sanitation service, and a centralized, if roughshod, bureaucracy to organize
and run the temporary city. Most of the departments created then are still
in existence, although they’ve grown and evolved into well organized
departments with tasks and responsibilities all year, including the Black
Rock Rangers - a volunteer group of community members dedicated to assisting
citizens with disputes, playa safety, and other issues; the Department
of Public Works - the crew who build, run and dismantle the physical city
each year; and the Artery - the volunteers who help artists on-site curate,
place, document and map the art and installations.
After the fiery spectacle of the Inferno theme, more and more art was
being burned, usually by the creators themselves seeking a similarly cathartic
experience, but often by other overzealous participants, who saw the destruction
of the art as an entitled expression. Unsurprisingly, this upset many
artists, but it also upset the Bureau of Land Management, who regard unregulated
fires on the Playa as very environmentally destructive - essentially turning
sections of the playa into permanent glass scars that run deep under the
surface. If Burning Man wanted to set fires, stated the BLM, they would
be required to protect the playa surface. As the number of artworks increased
each year, the task of keeping track and insuring the safety of the art
and people was becoming too overwhelming to be handled by volunteers,
and Burning Man hired a full-time curator, Christine Kristen, (aka LadyBee)
who remains in that position today. She oversees and coordinates the onsite
needs of hundreds of artists each years, and now that Burning Man helps
to fund some of the playa art and installations, her responsibility includes
distributing hundreds of thousands of dollars in grant money each year
- a fact that had remained relatively unknown until a few years ago, but
has recently taken center stage in a growing political dispute within
the community as a splinter group, the self-labeled Borg2.
Dissatisfied with perceived problems within the Burning Man art funding
process, the Borg2 demanded no less that a complete and total overhaul
of how Burning Man does business and distributes art grants on the Playa.
Burning Man had finally matured to the point of establishing itself as
a small, but growing force in the fine art world. The whiff of favoritism
and nepotism were in the air, rumors of corruption and backdoor dealing
were heard. Burning Man now had to face the fact that in many people’s
opinion, it had come to embody the very thing it most opposed - establishment,
and all the bureaucratic red tape associated with it. Somehow, the rebels
were now the empire. Burning Man had become “the Man”.
MATURITY
As the grumblings of some community members grew, so did the event in
general, and soon it was host to more than 30,000 people each year. The
city evolved into a visual spectacle as individual camps evolved into
outrageous theme camps, expressing whatever the participants wanted. Among
the more memorable are: ThunderDome, a recreation of the battle arena
from the Road Warrior sequel, complete with harness-suspended combatants
beating each other with padded staffs; Barbie Death Camp, an installation
of hundreds of the ubiquitous 12” dolls being led to gas chambers
and other tortures by various GI Joe and troll figures; Spock Mountain
Research, essentially the porch of a rundown Appalachian shack, complete
with “shotgun” toting locals in rocking chairs observing the
people who pass by observing them. Some camps offered massage or body
painting, some offered ice cream, liquor or simply berate pedestrians
verbally with an Obnoxicator - a megaphone modified with guitar effects
and cheap electronics capable of truly earsplitting sounds and which more
than lives up to it’s name.
Each year, theme camps vie for high visibility locations which are mostly
mapped out before the event. Like most of the art, theme camps can cost
thousands of dollars and take months, if not all year, to produce. They
are direct expressions of their creators and take the various forms of
serious art, silly parody, social service, community space, dance floor,
sex club, jazz bar - whatever the creator intends.
Each year since 1996, Burning Man has adopted an overarching theme for
the event, as a way to focus the energies of, and tie together the community.
These themes are specific enough to guide creative activities, yet open-ended
enough to allow for liberal interpretation. Some past themes include Time,
The Vault of Heaven, The Body, The Floating World. As the relevance of
the themes evolved each year, LadyBee and the art crew found themselves
beginning to distribute funds to individuals and groups for theme-specific
art projects on the Playa. At first the funding procedure was informal
and largely unknown outside the circle of organizers and a handful of
funded artists. In time the process has become more structured and formalized,
but still maintains the egalitarian vision of the original intent. Decisions
are still based primarily on thematic relevance, interactivity and a general
affinity for the work. Essentially irrelevant are the criteria that most
granting bodies consider fundamental, such as artist’s education,
exhibition history, or even proven skills. The granting of money directly
back to a small number of artists has had a profound significance within
the culture of Burning Man, and has been instrumental in the emergence
of social, political, and economic movements within the community. Organizers
quickly realized the potential to effectively communicate their vision
through the economic support of artworks on the playa and have continued
to increase the yearly grant budget. In 2006, the amount earmarked for
distribution is $400,000. Burning Man is generally acknowledged to be
the largest private funding source for art in California, an ironic fact
considering the funded artworks are all intended for the Nevada desert.
BEYOND
BLACK ROCK DESERT
During the late 90’s Burning Man organizers and community members
were starting to feel that what was happening on the Playa was an idea
important enough to communicate to the rest of the world. The freedom
of art unaffected by typical modern art world concerns, combined with
a renewed emphasis on community involvement and interactivity, created
a sense that a movement was stirring - both an art and a cultural movement.
Out of this emerged the Black Rock Arts Foundation (BRAF), a nonprofit
organization dedicated to the support of community-based interactive art
year-round beyond the borders and scope of the Burning Man event. With
a board consisting of longtime burners, and mutually shared goals between
the two organizations, the BRAF has become in many ways, the legitimate
face of the movement started by Burning Man - a way to spread the idea
of radical self expression and community interaction to everyone, regardless
of one’s direct involvement with the event. The BRAF has created
relationships with other organizations like Burning Man, and has shared
the efforts to bring interactive art to these emerging regional events.
Most recently, the BRAF has begun working with the San Francisco Arts
Commission, as described by LadyBee:
Recently
we had this great development with the city of SF where they wanted
to exhibit public art and we are essentially curating it for them
because we have all this art that's suitable for public installation.
We’ve identified about 12 projects that are scheduled to go
up in the next year. The arts commission has been working with us
and its been great for us and them. Recently they’ve been trying
to put San Francisco on the map as an art town and we have all these
temporary installations and they saw the potential. So for us it’s
been great because it gets the word out about Burning Man. We try
to not just have the art sit out there but have events that create
community as a way of spreading our ethos. And it’s been wildly
successful. We just installed the second piece ( Michael Christian’s
flock ) down in civic center plaza.7
Another outgrowth of the art funding process occurred in the wake
of the event in 2004. Several longtime participants began to complain
loudly within the community about the perceived inequities and poor
management of the arts funding, lackluster artworks on the Playa and,
as they saw it, a general failure to support the community of artists.
This unrest first manifest itself in a website petition, in which
anyone from the community was invited to sign and leave any comments
they wished. It soon escalated into online flame wars, personal attacks
on LadyBee, Larry Harvey, and anyone who disagreed with the dissenters
that the procedure needed repair. As the debate grew, a political
group emerged, called the Borg2, with a detailed and specific agenda,
elected officials, and a mandate to “take back the event for
the artists”. |
Burning Man, and Larry in particular, responded to these demands in a
way that might surprise those unfamiliar with the event, but to the Burner
community seemed like a typically shrewd response. Rather than giving
in or rejecting the proposal outright, Larry suggested a contest of sorts.
If the Borg2 wanted to fund art based upon the citizenry voting, they
were certainly free to do so. However, they would also be responsible
for all other aspects of such a decision: curatorial facilitation, including
safety compliance, onsite mapping requirements, and most importantly,
raising their own money. If the Borg2 met it’s fundraising goals,
and people generally agreed that the work chosen via public vote was better
than the work curated by LadyBee and staff, then Larry would admit defeat.
In reality, the situation was a win-win for Burning Man. For more than
a year a debate raged and people became invigorated with one view or another,
but regardless of their opinion, the art at Burning Man was a constant
central focus for many - and many feel the diversity and scope of art
on the playa was reinvigorated as a result. And ultimately, all the Playa
art is seen within the larger context of Burning Man regardless of its
funding sources.
One thing overlooked by Borg2 is that most of the playa art and installations
are not funded in any way by Burning Man. Perhaps five or ten percent
of theme related artworks receive funding, and even then the dollar amount
is always partial - the artist still must raise the balance. Most Playa
art each year is not related to the theme, and depends entirely upon the
artist’s ability to finance the work directly, or raise with private
fundraising. Burning Man responded to Borg2 in the same manner as it would
to any artist or group on the playa - they were welcomed with open arms
to participate in the event how they saw fit - even if expressing direct
criticism of the event’s central organizers . Burning Man would
be there to insure that legal, safety, and organizational details were
addressed. But facilitating their vision, including all fiscal needs,
would be the responsibility of Borg2 and it’s volunteer staff, not
Burning Man.
While Borg2 failed to meet its fund-raising goals, and it’s efforts
on the Playa were smaller in scope then they envisioned, in many ways
they achieved success in failure. Most attendees agree that the artwork
onsite, which had been less remarkable in recent years, was generally
better in 2005. Burning Man also agreed to several modifications to their
own granting procedures, including dropping a clause requiring artist
to pay back Burning Man in the event that a funded artwork eventually
sells ( a scenario that has literally never occurred). Burning Man also
agreed to consider earmarking some grant money for works that do not directly
address the annual theme. A Borg2 organizer recently stated the unlikelyhood
of another attempt to repeat their activities at the 2006 event, stating
“We proved our point”.
BURNING
MAN AT 20
As the social experiment known as Burning Man enters into it’s third
decade, it’s reputation is growing as an unique incubator of radical
expressions of vision that would otherwise go unrealized. The growth of
the population shows no signs of slowing, the number of self-funded works
is increasing, and the art grant dollar amount has increased significantly.
The artworks on the playa continue to defy easy categorization and the
curatorial staff continues it’s penchant for extravagance of scale
and audacious experiments in interactivity. The artworks,
| “...
become experimental tools, not final statements or museum pieces.
When the work has been experienced, the object that catalyzed the
experience can be liberated through its destruction. It doesn’t
matter how much time, energy and skill has been lavished on the object.
The point is not top cling to that shell, that structure, but to evolve
from it. If Burning Man is a cult, it is above all a cult of transformation.”8
|
This notion of transformation is universally regarded as integral to the
experience of Burning Man, whether on a creative, spiritual or physical
level. Many individuals regard the event as a kind of postmodern New Year’s
celebration - a more organic moment in the yearly cycle to celebrate death
and rebirth, endings and beginnings. Indeed, so many Burning Man artists
and others can recount tales of on-Playa failures, breakdowns, depression
and injury, that the cathartic release experienced from the complete destruction
of one’s work offers a chance to observe it from a new point of
view, and offers an unique opportunity for creative renewal. This transformation
was noted by a group of Stanford business graduates, who recently attempted
a sound project at Burning Man as a way of testing a technological proof-of-concept
for their business.
| "With
SoundIron, we failed to convert our love of music into a livelihood.
Although we did not build shareholder value, we ultimately found a
way to generate a different kind of value. With the help of many talented
and generous individuals, we created the value that follows from exercising
one's imagination, from committing to an inclusive process, from bringing
something extraordinary into being, from sharing that gift with others,
and from accepting the impermanence of that creation."9 |
This sentiment, of discovering the hidden value in one’s art beyond
the scope of commodity, has become a fundamental idea among those who’ve
struggled to bring their work to the desert. There is for many a sense
of differentness preceding the event - a shift in perspective and values
that for many manifests itself in radical transformation and lifestyle
changes. After attending the event, people have been known to give up
comfortable, secure lives to pursue their creative goals - some choose
to “go native” a level of volunteering and participation in
the annual life cycle of Burning Man that often ends in employment within
the organization.
With participants from all over the globe, and year-round regional events
that share community ideals and continue to spread the message of the
original event, Burning Man has taken the form of an art movement. Perhaps
not in the traditional notion of an art movement embodied in some distinct
style, media, or unified philosophy, but in a kind of post-ism definition
of an art movement, one created and supported by a highly literate, technologically
savvy, and decentralized community of individuals, all of whom share a
common bond, but few of whom would agree on it’s definition. As
LadyBee suggests:
| “By
this point after 20 yrs., it clearly is an art movement, in the sense
that there are people who live and make their art from Burning Man
to Burning Man. They believe in the idea of gifting their art to the
community and having it exist for a week for everyone’s pleasure
and enjoyment - and not for the fact of putting it on their resume
or selling it through a gallery. The idea that art can be made for
reasons other than for sale is a radical idea in our culture because
the art world is like all the other marketing worlds - it’s
just products, sales and marketing. So we’ve taken it out of
that context and instead focus on the self-expression, without artists
having to be consistent with their body of work, without having to
sell.”10 |
The notion of a space for art that is free from the constraints and pressures
of the capitalist art markets is not original to Burning Man, as there
is a long and rich tradition of alternative and underground spaces for
art, in addition to individuals artists and groups dedicated to that goal.
Over the last two decades, Burning Man has becomes a leading force endorsing
and supporting aggressively noncommercial art and performances by providing
a unique environment in which artists can create experimental works that
would struggle to find support, or might be prohibited entirely, in any
other fine art realm.
This is due in no small part to the hedonistic abandon and festive atmosphere
of the event. But there is a deeper force at work driving Burning Man,
which separates it from the myriad art and music festivals throughout
the world. The consistent resistance to overexposure in the media, external
economic forces and corporate commodification in general has allowed it
to maintain a remarkably neutral exhibition environment. The difficulty
of reaching the Black Rock City location, the sheer magnitude of the emptiness
of the Playa, and the incredibly harsh living conditions function like
a filter upon the population, insuring that only those with clear intent
actually make it to the event. The central focus on burning and rebirth
rituals of both the Man, and potentially one’s own art, insure that
for many participants the trek to the event is a profoundly transformative
annual pilgrimage. With the emergence of the Black Rock Arts Foundation,
committed to supporting the exhibition of interactive, community-based
artwork, and the development of the growing network of regional festivals
throughout the world, Burning Man, and it’s vision of radical self-expression
is becoming viral. As individual groups and subgroups constantly emerge
within the community, each reflecting some facet of the core ideals and
vision of event and taking it with them back to the real world, they spread
the Burning Man virus in the form of TAZ’s in the schools, galleries,
and theaters of their default communities. |